The two men at the Roadhouse were credited as "Richard Bucher - Man Hit with Bottle" and "Scott Cameron - Throwing Man", so it wasn't Bobby or anyone else we know. However, I thought the attacker called the other man "Barney" (does anyone have subtitles for the episode...

Yeah, I suppose there's a plausible interpretation where all the Roadhouse scenes except for Audrey's actually happened, and that all those random single-scene character conversations were there for thematic reasons.

Yeah, I'm now really curious just how all these Road House scenes are going to tie into Audrey. It seems to be pointing towards all these scenes having occurred in some sort of shared dreamspace type deal, but least a few of the scenes set there still have to be real. So I'm kind of lost as to how i...

Well, Part 14 certainly threw some interesting wrinkles into the Audrey theories. We've now seen new characters in a different location discuss the same people we previously saw Audrey and Charlie discussing. So either Audrey is in the real world, or most (if not all) of these Road House scenes have...

Obviously the timeline in the Twin Peaks set scenes is a bit of a mess at this point, but I wouldn't necessarily assume so many of the other town-set scenes we saw in Part 13 took place on Day 9 just because the Bobby/Ed/Norma scene so clearly did. I can only assume Lynch decided that waiting this l...

Jerry Horne wrote:The Blu-Ray set (Entire Mystery) seems OOP in the U.S. You can only get it from second hand sellers on Amazon.

Just noticed this. Presumably that means they're planning another box set that includes the new season, which would make sense.

I also lean towards the Twin Peaks scenes being on Day 9, mostly because otherwise it would mean Richard spent more than a day just relaxing prior to getting to work on covering up his hit-and-run.

Probably not Red. Reports on Getty's casting precede reports on Sarsgaard by about two weeks.

http://tvline.com/2015/09/20/twin-peaks ... -showtime/

http://tvline.com/2015/10/06/twin-peaks ... e-revival/

Here's the barometer of whether or the show is a cultural success: if the pop culture sites are still writing about it by week 12.

I think Peaks has reentered the cultural consciousness with a bang, actually. It's just that not everyone watched live. And even if they fall off more, it's still there. This isn't going away anytime soon. It was a major event here in America. Yeah, it would a mistake to equate "cultural event...

And here's Joe Adalian's analysis of the numbers.

http://www.vulture.com/2017/05/twin-pea ... cares.html

mfleite wrote:I think another factor in a possible renewal will be awards season. Emmy nominations will be announced July 13

Show won't be eligible until next year's Emmys.

Jerry Horne wrote:http://variety.com/2017/tv/news/twin-pe ... 202441519/

That is definitely the glass half-full interpretation. Truth probably settles somewhere around "mild disappointment."

Panapaok wrote:Expect the numbers to drop more. It's a very challenging and abstract show and it's very lengthy. I think Showtime is kinda expecting this anyway.

Yeah, and they'll bottom out even more once Ray Donovan premieres and it's moved up an hour.

Apparently the On Demand numbers were good: http://deadline.com/2017/05/twin-peaks-showtime-streaming-service-signups-record-1202100511/ Yep, I posted that a page ago. I think, first of all, Lynch/Frost need to be interested in more. It may come down to sign-ups, merch sales and home video sales et...