It's a joke.
Ha-ha.
But if the joke turns out to be true (and It's not beyond the realm of possibilities AT ALL)... people will believe that she knew and they will be even more pissed at her.

It was an ill-advised move on her part.

Sent from my BBB100-2 using Tapatalk

Apologies if this is mentioned earlier in the thread, I haven't had chance to read though properly. Two birds, one stone. Richard and Linda. Richard died on a (large) stone. EDIT: Obviously, this is indeed mentioned previously. We'll be back at that place in the final 2 hours for sure. I still thin...

Too bad about the Jeffries date mixup. More TP date problems... It is actually correct, the last time Cooper saw Jeffries was in 1989. In the original script for FWWM that scene takes place after the "one year later" point and after we have been introduced to Twin Peaks and Laura Palmer. ...

'' as she backs away when they enter'' It's so obvious to me now that I know. Can't understand why I didn't hear it the first 5 times [emoji23] Many thanks! probably cos it sounds abit like '' wengyay end her '' :P You just HAD to do that, didn't you? And you know exactly what I mean! [emoji23] Sen...

Apologies if this has already been asked and answered (I've spent most of my free time rewatching part 14, and not enough time on here) but when Albert is explaining the first Blue Rose case to Tammy, and he's talking about when the detectives first kick the door in, he says something about a woman...

Apologies if this has already been asked and answered (I've spent most of my free time rewatching part 14, and not enough time on here) but when Albert is explaining the first Blue Rose case to Tammy, and he's talking about when the detectives first kick the door in, he says something about a woman ...

KyleRickards wrote:Love The Return and started watching on original run in the UK


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

What he said ^

Sent from my BBB100-2 using Tapatalk

Wonderful & Strange wrote:This poll could result in spoilers since some people have seen part 14.

I don't care, but some may not want to step in here.

I've stayed off here all week for that exact reason.
And that's annoying as I love to read this! It gets me through the week!!

Sent from my BBB100-2 using Tapatalk

In my defence, the post is called "is BOB gone for good" ....

Sent from my BBB100-2 using Tapatalk

I cannot imagine for one second that we've seen the last of BOB. No one said we've "seen the last" of him, but I personally believe that he isn't "with" Mr C anymore. I'm sure we'll get some more BOB moments until the season's over with. Ah! My bad. Wasn't reading properly. I ca...

I cannot imagine for one second that we've seen the last of BOB.

Sent from my BBB100-2 using Tapatalk

Not done my second watch just yet. Didn't hate the episode but I didn't love it. What did stand out to me was Sarah and her comment about the jerky. To me, it implies that things aren't where they are supposed to be. In town. Maybe even in time. I can definitely see a time-altering element creeping ...

I would just like to point out, on the off chance that no one else already has, that seeing 2 people standing together (granted it was closely together) is literally ALL we have to go on and we have already decided that they are sleeping together. Maybe Becky is just that nutty girl who can't handl...

Seeing Gersten Hayward slumming it and having an affair with a married man roughly half her age makes me feel like RIchard Horne might actually be Donna Hayward/Horne's son, and Gersten the burnt out aunt who was a negative influence. But then again, the town of Twin Peaks in 2017 is a giant traile...

Seeing Gersten Hayward slumming it and having an affair with a married man roughly half her age makes me feel like RIchard Horne might actually be Donna Hayward/Horne's son, and Gersten the burnt out aunt who was a negative influence. But then again, the town of Twin Peaks in 2017 is a giant traile...