Search found 138 matches

by ScarFace32
Fri Sep 01, 2017 8:42 pm
Forum: Parts Discussion
Topic: Part 16 - No knock, no doorbell (SPOILERS)
Replies: 1166
Views: 168721

Re: Part 16 - No knock, no doorbell (SPOILERS)

If you watch the credits this season, only one visual effects house has done the effects in every part: BUF. So the same guys that did the super realistic atom bomb test and frog-bug also did the tulpa effects. So it isn't about cost or the quality of the effects house doing the work, it clearly is...
by ScarFace32
Fri Sep 01, 2017 5:03 pm
Forum: Parts Discussion
Topic: Part 16 - No knock, no doorbell (SPOILERS)
Replies: 1166
Views: 168721

Re: Part 16 - No knock, no doorbell (SPOILERS)

Yes I watched it, you're right but also how much of those visuals were determined by the cost? Who actually made the effects used in that short? If you watch the credits this season, only one visual effects house has done the effects in every part: BUF. So the same guys that did the super realistic...
by ScarFace32
Fri Sep 01, 2017 4:11 pm
Forum: Parts Discussion
Topic: Part 16 - No knock, no doorbell (SPOILERS)
Replies: 1166
Views: 168721

Re: Part 16 - No knock, no doorbell (SPOILERS)

Nobody's saying those are digital effects. It's an example of physical collage work in comparison to what's essentially being done with computers in Twin Peaks. What's the comparison? Those collages are well executed while the Tulpa disappearing scenes look like shit I think ur wanting to argue jus...
by ScarFace32
Fri Sep 01, 2017 1:27 pm
Forum: Parts Discussion
Topic: Part 16 - No knock, no doorbell (SPOILERS)
Replies: 1166
Views: 168721

Re: Part 16 - No knock, no doorbell (SPOILERS)

look - shitty effects: https://theapproach.co.uk/artists/john-stezaker/images/ I don't get it, those aren't digital effects Nobody's saying those are digital effects. It's an example of physical collage work in comparison to what's essentially being done with computers in Twin Peaks. What's the com...
by ScarFace32
Fri Sep 01, 2017 1:19 pm
Forum: Parts Discussion
Topic: Part 16 - No knock, no doorbell (SPOILERS)
Replies: 1166
Views: 168721

Re: Part 16 - No knock, no doorbell (SPOILERS)

The problem is these effects are shitty and cheap and look like they are from some stupid game like fucking candy crush or one of those stupid instagram apps where it transposes shit over the picture look - shitty effects: https://theapproach.co.uk/artists/john-stezaker/images/ I don't get it, thos...
by ScarFace32
Fri Sep 01, 2017 1:07 pm
Forum: Parts Discussion
Topic: Part 16 - No knock, no doorbell (SPOILERS)
Replies: 1166
Views: 168721

Re: Part 16 - No knock, no doorbell (SPOILERS)

People are still going off about the CGI? Has everybody been conditioned so widely that CGI must inherently equal realism, and that intentionally wanting to look like something else is unthinkable/nigh implausible? I'm not saying "you have to like it" but jeez louise is it getting old. &q...
by ScarFace32
Fri Sep 01, 2017 12:58 pm
Forum: Parts Discussion
Topic: Part 16 - No knock, no doorbell (SPOILERS)
Replies: 1166
Views: 168721

Re: Part 16 - No knock, no doorbell (SPOILERS)

When people get upset or annoyed about some of the Lodge FX, it's because they have a preconception of the "real." . No, everyone keeps ignoring what I've said to tell me the effects don't have to be realistic. No shit. I never said they had to be realistic. I'm all for surrealistic or co...
by ScarFace32
Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:38 am
Forum: Parts Discussion
Topic: Part 16 - No knock, no doorbell (SPOILERS)
Replies: 1166
Views: 168721

Re: Part 16 - No knock, no doorbell (SPOILERS)

Yeah, I actually thought the tulpa-deseeding process looked very Terry Gilliam-esque, and was apropos. Now, the real world Duncan Todd headshot is another story -- I much prefer the practical effects of something like Bobby shooting the guy in the head in the woods in FWWM, but given that it was no...
by ScarFace32
Thu Aug 31, 2017 11:58 pm
Forum: Parts Discussion
Topic: Part 16 - No knock, no doorbell (SPOILERS)
Replies: 1166
Views: 168721

Re: Part 16 - No knock, no doorbell (SPOILERS)

I'm still reading this thread but did Diane say that the Convenience Store (Gas station in her words) was next to the Sheriff's station? Does that mean the convenience store is right in Twin Peaks next to the sheriff's station? Are they going to have a shot of the sheriff's station and pan out and ...
by ScarFace32
Thu Aug 31, 2017 11:38 pm
Forum: Parts Discussion
Topic: Part 16 - No knock, no doorbell (SPOILERS)
Replies: 1166
Views: 168721

Re: Part 16 - No knock, no doorbell (SPOILERS)

People are still going off about the CGI? Has everybody been conditioned so widely that CGI must inherently equal realism, and that intentionally wanting to look like something else is unthinkable/nigh implausible? I'm not saying "you have to like it" but jeez louise is it getting old. &q...
by ScarFace32
Thu Aug 31, 2017 5:02 pm
Forum: Parts Discussion
Topic: Part 16 - No knock, no doorbell (SPOILERS)
Replies: 1166
Views: 168721

Re: Part 16 - No knock, no doorbell (SPOILERS)

Perfectly stated! Also don't forget where they grew up, and the fact that they never had parents. My feeling is that they mostly "played the part" in Vegas, that is they faked it until they made it in Vegas and beating a guy that they are sure cheated them of $500K is a small price all th...
by ScarFace32
Thu Aug 31, 2017 3:09 pm
Forum: Parts Discussion
Topic: Part 16 - No knock, no doorbell (SPOILERS)
Replies: 1166
Views: 168721

Re: Part 16 - No knock, no doorbell (SPOILERS)

I'm still reading this thread but did Diane say that the Convenience Store (Gas station in her words) was next to the Sheriff's station? Does that mean the convenience store is right in Twin Peaks next to the sheriff's station? Are they going to have a shot of the sheriff's station and pan out and t...
by ScarFace32
Thu Aug 31, 2017 3:02 pm
Forum: Parts Discussion
Topic: Part 16 - No knock, no doorbell (SPOILERS)
Replies: 1166
Views: 168721

Re: RE: Re: Part 16 - No knock, no doorbell (SPOILERS)

Other than the beating of the casino manager, we're not aware of any crime committed by them. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk I thought they are involved with insurance fraud and shit? They were also just about to kill Cooper before he gave them the check Bradley was 'itching' to kill Coop, so it'...
by ScarFace32
Thu Aug 31, 2017 2:48 pm
Forum: Parts Discussion
Topic: Part 16 - No knock, no doorbell (SPOILERS)
Replies: 1166
Views: 168721

Re: Part 16 - No knock, no doorbell (SPOILERS)

i think b/c they bought sonny jim the gym set. I feel like he's going to arrest them at some point. Cooper doesn't seem like he would overlook their crimes because they bought him new cars and a gym set. He is the FBI. But maybe Cooper's experiences in the Lodge have changed his perception of what'...
by ScarFace32
Thu Aug 31, 2017 2:35 pm
Forum: Parts Discussion
Topic: Part 16 - No knock, no doorbell (SPOILERS)
Replies: 1166
Views: 168721

Re: Part 16 - No knock, no doorbell (SPOILERS)

A minor point, but wondering what people think about this: WHY would Cooper say that he knows that the Mitchum bros have hearts of gold??? As much as I thought the Mitchum brothers were amazing character in this season, how could Coop of all people come to think they have hearts of gold? I mean the...

Go to advanced search