No giant sequence at all. It's just a hard cut from the trunk to Bill running his fingers over his head. In fact, there's a sound bridge between the scene with the meat in the trunk and Bill in his cell--that low rumble fades in during the shot of the trunk, continues over the cut, and then cuts ou...

krishnanspace wrote:

sackboy97 wrote:

krishnanspace wrote:Episode 5 has leaked again

Where?

Comcast Xfinity.This time in USA

I wonder if it will appear anywhere else...

krishnanspace wrote:Episode 5 has leaked again

Where?

Regarding the different timeline/alternate reality for Good Coop, I don't think that really fits with Mike's message he sees in Part 04. Wouldn't he say something about it? Instead he just says that one of them has to die, implying that they are indeed in the same "world".

I'm not sure that classifies as product placement though; we see those brands because we see them around us in our everyday life. The only time when the brand was the "focus" was with the car in Part 1, but even then, I don't think the car brand was the point of the shot.

Soolsma wrote:And what was that 'truckload of valium' supposed to imply?

I thought he simply meant they're going to need a lot to make it through this experience, or something along those lines.

Having just rewatched Part 3, I have to say that I kinda like Chrysta Bell in the scene where she's explaining what happened in NY. The last scene is weird though, she is just there, somewhat nodding at what Albert is saying.

Such hostility posted under the guise of politeness and intellectualism. May I remind each of you this is the support group thread for those who are disappointed in it. You both are lovers of S3 who are on this thread. Please do not tell me what to think or what to do, especially on this thread, as...

Ah 4 hours is enough to know if you like something or not or more to the point, whether you are enjoying watching something or not. It's absolutely fair to say if you have enjoyed/liked it or not, I don't think it's fair to say much else. As it would be silly to review a movie without watching it e...

I've had a mild change of heart Just posted this in the Twin Peaks sub reddit; Pretty much sums up my feelings at present https://www.reddit.com/r/twinpeaks/comments/6dgeg3/s3e4_reevaluation_of_a_hater/?st=J35SM2MW&sh=c587c6f9 I love the line attack used against you is that you've only seen fou...

I'd also like to propose (it's probably already been said): It looked like Mr C had cultivated a fair amount of garmonbozia (especially compared to Dougie). Losing it seems to have made him revert a little back to what he was in the season 2 finale. I don't think it's losing it that made him revert...

Hockey Mask wrote:I can not die peacefully without seeing Albert meet Wally.

Poor Albert

Honestly, I don't like him much, but that scene was pretty funny. One of the most "Twin Peaks" moments, imho.

This is the best image I could manage, but trust me, the license tab reads 03 - 2003 - our good friend Agent Cooper is in an earlier time period than the remainder of the story. The eyeless woman did not want him going to 2015 for reasons I cannot begin to guess, she threw a switch that set the des...

Does anyone else think that Cooper might have been talking to Mike on the phone? The line "I will be with Bob again" sounds like something he would say.