I bet that she is just busy with Cannes. She is opening the festival this year as the mistress of ceremonies. I'm quite certain she'll be there for Cannes red carpet next week though, even if her role is small.OrsonWelles wrote:What about Monica Bellucci.She's a very high-profile actrice but she's been absent of promo's etc.?
NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread
Moderators: Brad D, Annie, Jonah, BookhouseBoyBob, Ross, Jerry Horne
- Pölkkyrouva
- Roadhouse Member
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2017 2:16 am
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
Let a smile be your umbrella. — FBI Regional Bureau Chief Gordon Cole
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
Poor accountant gave millions and millions never saw even one scene!Judge Giant wrote:Dutch piece here with some interesting thoughts after watching the premiere. ZERO spoilers btw.
https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2017/05/20/da ... 1-a1559766
You need to translate it, obviously. Didn't want to put the quote directly into here just incase...
F*&^ you Gene Kelly
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
So he did!Ross wrote:Not sure! But Marcia Brady was there too. So some unrelated people got invites somehow.Venus wrote:Does anyone know why Rob Morrow and his wife Debbon Ayer were there? All I can think is Northern Exposure is a tenuous link but surely there must be more of a link?
Morrow tweeted a very positive response to the premiere!
- Attachments
-
- rm tweet.png (622.41 KiB) Viewed 9641 times
When Jupiter and Saturn meet...
- OrsonWelles
- Roadhouse Member
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 11:50 pm
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
Not THAT positive is it? (Well, not negative. He's just saying the actors and crew were perhaps a bit too enthusiastic for it to be entirely sincere and that Lynch didn't pay attention to fans. But still)Judge Giant wrote:Dutch piece here with some interesting thoughts after watching the premiere. ZERO spoilers btw.
https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2017/05/20/da ... 1-a1559766
You need to translate it, obviously. Didn't want to put the quote directly into here just incase...
- Judge Giant
- Roadhouse Member
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Wed May 03, 2017 3:30 am
- Contact:
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
Saw another blue tick (I can't remember who...) retweet/quote this in a way that pretty much confirmed they felt the same way.Venus wrote:So he did!Ross wrote:Not sure! But Marcia Brady was there too. So some unrelated people got invites somehow.Venus wrote:Does anyone know why Rob Morrow and his wife Debbon Ayer were there? All I can think is Northern Exposure is a tenuous link but surely there must be more of a link?
Morrow tweeted a very positive response to the premiere!
This was a vision, fresh and clear as a mountain stream. The mind revealing itself to itself.
Visit my Lynch blog at https://lynchiantimes.wordpress.com, or follow on twitter https://twitter.com/LynchianTimes
Visit my Lynch blog at https://lynchiantimes.wordpress.com, or follow on twitter https://twitter.com/LynchianTimes
- Fashion Suicide
- Roadhouse Member
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2017 10:05 pm
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o38ZhonzEYU#t=152.85542
So, they DID at least both re-watch the last episode at least.
So, they DID at least both re-watch the last episode at least.
- Judge Giant
- Roadhouse Member
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Wed May 03, 2017 3:30 am
- Contact:
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
It's hard to tell due to it being a translation, but I get a positive vibe from it myself. At the very least what they say about horror/humour will please some.OrsonWelles wrote:Not THAT positive is it? (Well, not negative. He's just saying the actors and crew were perhaps a bit too enthusiastic for it to be entirely sincere and that Lynch didn't pay attention to fans. But still)Judge Giant wrote:Dutch piece here with some interesting thoughts after watching the premiere. ZERO spoilers btw.
https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2017/05/20/da ... 1-a1559766
You need to translate it, obviously. Didn't want to put the quote directly into here just incase...
This was a vision, fresh and clear as a mountain stream. The mind revealing itself to itself.
Visit my Lynch blog at https://lynchiantimes.wordpress.com, or follow on twitter https://twitter.com/LynchianTimes
Visit my Lynch blog at https://lynchiantimes.wordpress.com, or follow on twitter https://twitter.com/LynchianTimes
- Wonderful & Strange
- Great Northern Member
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2014 10:01 pm
- Contact:
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
The important take away from that Dutch article is that the new Peaks has equal parts humor and horror, and that the audience laughed at all the right times.
Seems like that should relax some here.
Seems like that should relax some here.
Member of the Agent Tammy Preston Defense Lodge
-
- Bookhouse Member
- Posts: 1173
- Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2017 12:55 am
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
Dr. Joel Fleischman!
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
My big takeaway is that translation software makes for a lot of hilarity.Wonderful & Strange wrote:The important take away from that Dutch article is that the new Peaks has equal parts humor and horror, and that the audience laughed at all the right times.
Seems like that should relax some here.
F*&^ you Gene Kelly
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
I too would be interested to find out. I think it's weird they weren't photographed together. I would have thought someone could have staged managed the two co-creators side by side for the photo call. It would have been a great moment.Ross wrote:Did Lynch and Frost interact at all at the premiere?
When Jupiter and Saturn meet...
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
Wonderful & Strange wrote:The important take away from that Dutch article is that the new Peaks has equal parts humor and horror, and that the audience laughed at all the right times.
Seems like that should relax some here.
I think that an even bigger thing to take away from the article is that it states very clearly that is has the samen feel/vibe as the original. If true, that is the single biggest piece of TP news since the announcement of the return. Much, much bigger news than information about this or that actor (not) returning.
Keeping my fingers crossed, though, that the reviewer is wrong or that it will be increasingly dark and abstract from part 3/4 on. I would be extremely dissapointed if the entire Return feels familiar to the first seasons.
I'm staying positive for now. Lynch himself said that season 2 sucked. So I'm confident that the old mistakes will not be repeated and that we will see a higher quality show.
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
Am I the only one who's sensing tension between the two? Is that why you were asking this, Ross? It's nothing more than reading between the lines, of course. But I get the impression that they are far from inseparable.Venus wrote:I too would be interested to find out. I think it's weird they weren't photographed together. I would have thought someone could have staged managed the two co-creators side by side for the photo call. It would have been a great moment.Ross wrote:Did Lynch and Frost interact at all at the premiere?
The guy interviewing the cast did not mention Mark a single time by the way. It was all David, David, David.
Last edited by Rhodes on Sat May 20, 2017 1:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- secretlettermkr
- RR Diner Member
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2016 11:14 am
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
i feel the same , since lynch "left" ...Rhodes wrote:
Am I the only one who's sensing tension between the two?.
- BEARisonFord
- RR Diner Member
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2016 10:19 am
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
I mean, based on what? This is basically all conjecture and trying to squeeze something out of a whole lot of nothing. None of us are privy to what their personal or professional relationship is or isn't.Rhodes wrote: Am I the only one who's sensing tension between the two? It's nothing more than reading between the lines, of course. But I get the impression that they are far from inseparable.
The guy interviewing the cast did not mention Mark a single time by the way. It was all David, David, David.