NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread
Moderators: Brad D, Annie, Jonah, BookhouseBoyBob, Ross, Jerry Horne
- Jerry Horne
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 4634
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:28 pm
- Location: Private Portland Airport
- Contact:
Re: NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread
Yes, there is pop up Twin Peaks store at the Fest of Disruption with new merchandise.
Reminder, there is a thread for the Fest here: http://www.dugpa.com/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 843#p59843
Reminder, there is a thread for the Fest here: http://www.dugpa.com/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 843#p59843
- Attachments
-
- Screen Shot 2016-10-07 at 1.06.05 PM.png (697.06 KiB) Viewed 9822 times
RARE TWIN PEAKS COLLECTIBLES AT ---> WWW.TWINPEAKSGENERALSTORE.BLOGSPOT.COM
- saygoodbyetojack
- Roadhouse Member
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 1:18 am
- Location: Dublin
Re: NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread
Very cool Jerry!
- N. Needleman
- Lodge Member
- Posts: 2113
- Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2014 2:39 pm
Re: NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread
If that's the entry booth and there's no teaser or trailer (or one left unreleased to the public outside the Festival), this is a new kind of sadism heretofore unknown to man.
AnotherBlueRoseCase wrote:The Return is clearly guaranteed a future audience among stoners and other drug users.
- Jerry Horne
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 4634
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:28 pm
- Location: Private Portland Airport
- Contact:
Re: NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread
From our very own Woodsman:
- Attachments
-
- CuMQVOyVUAAfuJ4.jpg (385.93 KiB) Viewed 9803 times
RARE TWIN PEAKS COLLECTIBLES AT ---> WWW.TWINPEAKSGENERALSTORE.BLOGSPOT.COM
- N. Needleman
- Lodge Member
- Posts: 2113
- Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2014 2:39 pm
Re: NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread
Okay, this is my last unhinged message about this (for now): I'd totally go if I had anything decent to wear and tix weren't like $200. Oy.
AnotherBlueRoseCase wrote:The Return is clearly guaranteed a future audience among stoners and other drug users.
- Harry S. Truman
- RR Diner Member
- Posts: 321
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 2:48 pm
- Location: Spain
Re: NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread
I Agree!!N. Needleman wrote:If that's the entry booth and there's no teaser or trailer (or one left unreleased to the public outside the Festival), this is a new kind of sadism heretofore unknown to man.
- Trudy Chelgren
- RR Diner Member
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2016 2:07 am
Re: NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread
It may be off-topic but, does anyone else actually want this to be the end of Twin Peaks? Not in a 'i hate it why won't it die' kind of way, but in that, as for me at least, I want this next season to have an air of finality about it. Of things coming to an end. Not neccessarily in a depressive Fire Walk with Me kind of plunge into despair, however moving that may be, but I think Lynch at least writes really stunningly emotional closers to his films, even if plot lines still hang at loose ends.
At least in my opinion, if this season ends on a cliffhanger, or even promises more, I'll be disappointed. Sounds perverse I know, but Twin Peaks deserves a truly spectacular ending, and I feel now is the right time.
At least in my opinion, if this season ends on a cliffhanger, or even promises more, I'll be disappointed. Sounds perverse I know, but Twin Peaks deserves a truly spectacular ending, and I feel now is the right time.
- Eater of Iguanas
- RR Diner Member
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2015 9:17 pm
Re: NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread
I'm with you, pretty much. Honestly, my attitude is, "Whatever they want to give us, as long as it's amazing," but my strong impression is they intend this to be a wrap, and that seems the best choice to me. Further seasons means potentially more pressure from the suits to perform to certain expectations and more chances that Lynch gets distracted again. It's hard for me to see him, at his age and with all his interests and commitments, undertaking the exhausting task of producing several hours of high-quality cinematic material every year. Even younger whipper-snappers (like Parker & Stone on South Park, Benioff & Weiss on Game of Thrones) talk about how exhausting running a show year after year is. And I have little interest in a TP with reduced Lynch involvement. All respect to Frost's hard work in keeping the wheels turning, but DL is the magic elixir.Trudy Chelgren wrote:It may be off-topic but, does anyone else actually want this to be the end of Twin Peaks? Not in a 'i hate it why won't it die' kind of way, but in that, as for me at least, I want this next season to have an air of finality about it. Of things coming to an end. Not neccessarily in a depressive Fire Walk with Me kind of plunge into despair, however moving that may be, but I think Lynch at least writes really stunningly emotional closers to his films, even if plot lines still hang at loose ends.
At least in my opinion, if this season ends on a cliffhanger, or even promises more, I'll be disappointed. Sounds perverse I know, but Twin Peaks deserves a truly spectacular ending, and I feel now is the right time.
Besides, if S3 is as long as it sounds (my working guess is roughly 18 hours based on tidbits we've heard), that's equivalent to most of the original run (24 hours by my calculation). Plenty of time for us to get satisfaction.
What I would love to see is Lynch (who, budget spat aside, seems really happy with his experience on S3) producing other, shorter work for Showtime. Maybe Ronnie Rocket finally blasts off? Or One Saliva Bubble? I'd enjoy seeing Frost do a show for them, too.
- Jerry Horne
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 4634
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:28 pm
- Location: Private Portland Airport
- Contact:
Re: NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread
No.
After these 20 hours or so, I would like a further 20 hours with a certain actor who is apparently missing now.
After these 20 hours or so, I would like a further 20 hours with a certain actor who is apparently missing now.
RARE TWIN PEAKS COLLECTIBLES AT ---> WWW.TWINPEAKSGENERALSTORE.BLOGSPOT.COM
Re: NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread
This 100%Jerry Horne wrote:No.
After these 20 hours or so, I would like a further 20 hours with a certain actor who is apparently missing now.
"I can see half my life's history in your face... And I'm not sure that I want to."
http://twinpeakssoundtrackdesign.blogspot.com/
http://twinpeakssoundtrackdesign.blogspot.com/
- Jerry Horne
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 4634
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:28 pm
- Location: Private Portland Airport
- Contact:
Re: NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread
Ontkean.ForKeeps wrote:Who?
RARE TWIN PEAKS COLLECTIBLES AT ---> WWW.TWINPEAKSGENERALSTORE.BLOGSPOT.COM
- saygoodbyetojack
- Roadhouse Member
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2014 1:18 am
- Location: Dublin
Re: NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread
I also want more TP after this. And some more after that too.
- laughingpinecone
- Great Northern Member
- Posts: 725
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2016 6:45 am
- Location: D'ni
- Contact:
Re: NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread
What seems weird to me about this whole hypothesis is... it's not like he'll be less retired in 2018? I'd be all for 20 hours of the Hawaiian adventures of Dale and Harry, but if it wasn't feasible in 2015, why would it be 3+ years later?
] The gathered are known by their faces of stone.
- Jerry Horne
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 4634
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:28 pm
- Location: Private Portland Airport
- Contact:
Re: NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread
Circumstances and situations change. Sometimes people just change their mind. Only a few people know what's going on and they're not talking.laughingpinecone wrote:...if it wasn't feasible in 2015, why would it be 3+ years later?
RARE TWIN PEAKS COLLECTIBLES AT ---> WWW.TWINPEAKSGENERALSTORE.BLOGSPOT.COM