Re: Season 4? Or is it over after this?
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2018 8:58 pm
I would be really surprised if one of you isn't right.
a Twin Peaks and David Lynch Electrical Resource
https://www.dugpa.com/forum/
Well there is no middle groundbaxter wrote:I would be really surprised if one of you isn't right.
Unless this means he will have to start making responsible decisionsdkenny78 wrote:This certainly can't hurt the chances for a Season 4.
https://deadline.com/2018/10/david-nevi ... 202485602/
Hopefully this gives Nevins the power to grant Lynch's requests for time/money for filming. From what I can tell, time and money would be the biggest sticking points during hypothetical talks for a season 4. With season 3, Lynch didn't feel like he could explore as much as he wanted to due to time constraints.eyeboogers wrote:Unless this means he will have to start making responsible decisionsdkenny78 wrote:This certainly can't hurt the chances for a Season 4.
https://deadline.com/2018/10/david-nevi ... 202485602/
Great that someone who seems to enjoy creative concepts gets put in charge of such.
Hmm. I don't think that I've heard about that. All I know is that MJA explained his non-participation as being about low pay. I'm under the impression that pay was pretty low for everyone but Kyle. This didn't seem to be an insurmountable issue for most, because it was a prestige project, people love working under Lynch's direction, and the actors generally have affectionate relationships with their castmates. Some weren't even working anymore, so it was like a gift out of nowhere.N. Needleman wrote:I was under the impression that MJA allegedly tried to up his price at the last moment before his shooting date. Everyone was getting paid a base fee, IIRC; that wasn't gonna happen.
His absence left a hole in the show, so if he actually chose not to participate, then shame on him.Jasper wrote:P.S. I also don’t blame Michael Ontkean if money had something to do with his absence.
Michael Ontkean's job was(/is) to be an actor, You should get paid for the work you have trained to do, and yes salary negotiations are part of that. If he didn't feel like travelling long distance to be paid scale, fair enough.Mr. Strawberry wrote:His absence left a hole in the show, so if he actually chose not to participate, then shame on him.Jasper wrote:P.S. I also don’t blame Michael Ontkean if money had something to do with his absence.
Yes, if that's the case, and it's really that simple, then I blame him as well.N. Needleman wrote:If MJA agreed to participate then tried to up his rate immediately before his shooting date, then yes, I blame him.
I truly hope Ontkean is doing well, and would love to still see him appear in an eventual future season. But at the same time, I really hope it wasn't just down to being paid scale, especially when Lynch seemed very accommodating re: shooting schedules and probably would have made it work for Ontkean to spend as little time on set as possible. I'd like to believe Ontkean just wanted to do it, is all I'm saying, and understood and embraced the unprecedented nature of the opportunity. It would be nice to find out one day.eyeboogers wrote:Michael Ontkean's job was(/is) to be an actor, You should get paid for the work you have trained to do, and yes salary negotiations are part of that. If he didn't feel like travelling long distance to be paid scale, fair enough.Mr. Strawberry wrote:His absence left a hole in the show, so if he actually chose not to participate, then shame on him.Jasper wrote:P.S. I also don’t blame Michael Ontkean if money had something to do with his absence.