Yes. I watched the scene and disagree with your assessment. I guess we'll see.secretlettermkr wrote:???N. Needleman wrote:AFAIC the ladies are there. Simply filmed separately. Wait and see, I suppose.
you really watched the scene? if they are supose to be REALLY there, then, there's an awfull error in the editing, because they are NOT in there with the rest,.... and i dont think this is at all a mistake
Part 5 - Case files (SPOILERS)
Moderators: Brad D, Annie, Jonah, BookhouseBoyBob, Ross, Jerry Horne
- N. Needleman
- Lodge Member
- Posts: 2113
- Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2014 2:39 pm
Re: Part 5 - Case files (SPOILERS)
AnotherBlueRoseCase wrote:The Return is clearly guaranteed a future audience among stoners and other drug users.
Re: Part 5 - Case files (SPOILERS)
Couldn't the girls be standing against the wall opposite from the door? We never see that wall in the shots of Belushi & co.secretlettermkr wrote:???N. Needleman wrote:AFAIC the ladies are there. Simply filmed separately. Wait and see, I suppose.
you really watched the scene? if they are supose to be REALLY there, then, there's an awfull error in the editing, because they are NOT in there with the rest,.... and i dont think this is at all a mistake
- N. Needleman
- Lodge Member
- Posts: 2113
- Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2014 2:39 pm
Re: Part 5 - Case files (SPOILERS)
Yep.
AnotherBlueRoseCase wrote:The Return is clearly guaranteed a future audience among stoners and other drug users.
Re: Part 5 - Case files (SPOILERS)
Harvey might some sort of One-Armed Man type figure, collecting garmonbozia (or something Lodge-related) from near the scene of the murder.Jerry Horne wrote:Don't tell me we're going to be discussing what's in Harvey's black bag 25 years from now?
Is it the dossier? If so, do they realize it's importance?
The way he complained to Chip on the phone, over the ownership of the bag, it really reminded me of Phillip Gerard pulling beside Leland's car in FWWM and shouting at him...
Either way I loved Harvey and hope he pops up again.
Re: Part 5 - Case files (SPOILERS)
If forced to weigh in at this point in time, I tend to agree with Needleman's interpretation - but as he said - "I guess we'll see".N. Needleman wrote:Yes. I watched the scene and disagree with your assessment. I guess we'll see.secretlettermkr wrote:???N. Needleman wrote:AFAIC the ladies are there. Simply filmed separately. Wait and see, I suppose.
you really watched the scene? if they are supose to be REALLY there, then, there's an awfull error in the editing, because they are NOT in there with the rest,.... and i dont think this is at all a mistake
Re: Part 5 - Case files (SPOILERS)
That is one weird thing that Lynch always does -- he frequently doesn't use establishing shots for scenes, so often times you can't tell where different people and elements are in relation to one another.polishq wrote: Couldn't the girls be standing against the wall opposite from the door? We never see that wall in the shots of Belushi & co.
It's like in the pilot, when Lucy first gets Pete's phone call, and starts talking to Truman about it. Lucy is going on and on about something to Harry, and you never even know if they are in the same room or a whole hallway apart (until Harry walks into Lucy's shot, anyway). I can't think of another director that doesn't this. It's a pretty small detail, but it can really work to heighten tension and increase comedic effect.
- Jerry Horne
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 4634
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:28 pm
- Location: Private Portland Airport
- Contact:
Re: Part 5 - Case files (SPOILERS)
Agree, great character! Love how Lynch ends that scene with the phone cutting out...or something? Electricity?Cappy wrote:Harvey might some sort of One-Armed Man type figure, collecting garmonbozia (or something Lodge-related) from near the scene of the murder.Jerry Horne wrote:Don't tell me we're going to be discussing what's in Harvey's black bag 25 years from now?
Is it the dossier? If so, do they realize it's importance?
The way he complained to Chip on the phone, over the ownership of the bag, it really reminded me of Phillip Gerard pulling beside Leland's car in FWWM and shouting at him...
Either way I loved Harvey and hope he pops up again.
RARE TWIN PEAKS COLLECTIBLES AT ---> WWW.TWINPEAKSGENERALSTORE.BLOGSPOT.COM
- secretlettermkr
- RR Diner Member
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2016 11:14 am
Re: Part 5 - Case files (SPOILERS)
And the guards by the door?Cappy wrote:That is one weird thing that Lynch always does -- he frequently doesn't use establishing shots for scenes, so often times you can't tell where different people and elements are in relation to one another.polishq wrote: Couldn't the girls be standing against the wall opposite from the door? We never see that wall in the shots of Belushi & co.
It's like in the pilot, when Lucy first gets Pete's phone call, and starts talking to Truman about it. Lucy is going on and on about something to Harry, and you never even know if they are in the same room or a whole hallway apart (until Harry walks into Lucy's shot, anyway). I can't think of another director that doesn't this. It's a pretty small detail, but it can really work to heighten tension and increase comedic effect.
Re: Part 5 - Case files (SPOILERS)
yea - the lack of any guards by the door as the showgirl enters is a pretty stark continuity error. But I think it's possible, after the initial scene was filmed, Lynch thought something akin to "..gee, I should add in some showgirls who seem oblivious to the violence and one waves a hand mysteriously." And the guards were unavailable at the time of filming the showgirl material.secretlettermkr wrote: ...And the guards by the door?
- counterpaul
- RR Diner Member
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 1:06 am
Re: Part 5 - Case files (SPOILERS)
It's beautifully unsettling, from the moment Candie opens the door of what appears to be an otherwise empty room. It's not a plot thing--I'll eat my hat if we end up finding out that the women in pink are spirits or some such--it's a mood thing. They act as counterpoint to the violence and posturing going on in the scene and add an air of the uncanny. Why try to rationalize it? Twin Peaks isn't rational. What a scrumptious thing those cut-aways are!secretlettermkr wrote:???N. Needleman wrote:AFAIC the ladies are there. Simply filmed separately. Wait and see, I suppose.
you really watched the scene? if they are supose to be REALLY there, then, there's an awfull error in the editing, because they are NOT in there with the rest,.... and i dont think this is at all a mistake
-
- RR Diner Member
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Tue May 23, 2017 2:39 am
Re: Part 5 - Case files (SPOILERS)
Ah thank you!Jerry Horne wrote:Harvey. I should have said character not characters.KyleRickards wrote:Which shady characters?Jerry Horne wrote:What were those shady characters looking for at the apartment building in Buckhorn?
Why did Ruth have a book called Indian Heritage on her bookshelf?
Is Bad Coop looking for the Dossier?
Shelly is involved with Red?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
- secretlettermkr
- RR Diner Member
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2016 11:14 am
Re: Part 5 - Case files (SPOILERS)
this is not "rationalize",,, its an observation of a very obvious thing, if the intention wasnt to imply something off w these girls,... Lynch could have shot it or edited diferently,counterpaul wrote:It's beautifully unsettling, from the moment Candie opens the door of what appears to be an otherwise empty room. It's not a plot thing--I'll eat my hat if we end up finding out that the women in pink are spirits or some such--it's a mood thing. They act as counterpoint to the violence and posturing going on in the scene and add an air of the uncanny. Why try to rationalize it? Twin Peaks isn't rational. What a scrumptious thing those cut-aways are!secretlettermkr wrote:???N. Needleman wrote:AFAIC the ladies are there. Simply filmed separately. Wait and see, I suppose.
you really watched the scene? if they are supose to be REALLY there, then, there's an awfull error in the editing, because they are NOT in there with the rest,.... and i dont think this is at all a mistake
Again, i dont think for SURE im right, i only think its heading more that way, a friend of mine notice this, i didnt, he dont even mentioned what he saw, only point me too look at the scene again, and there it was, i cant unseen it now.... we'll see or maybe not,.... we'll see who candy is.... I dont think linch just trowed Amy Shields character in there at the last minute
- Twink Peaks
- RR Diner Member
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2017 2:01 pm
Re: Part 5 - Case files (SPOILERS)
love satoshi kon!!!!!!secretlettermkr wrote:TWIN PEAKS PART 5 - PERFECT BLUE
18893399_10211064463540584_7305791324595840463_n.jpg
- secretlettermkr
- RR Diner Member
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2016 11:14 am
Re: Part 5 - Case files (SPOILERS)
me too, PARANOIA AGENT! WHAT A SERIES!!!Twink Peaks wrote:love satoshi kon!!!!!!secretlettermkr wrote:TWIN PEAKS PART 5 - PERFECT BLUE
18893399_10211064463540584_7305791324595840463_n.jpg
- counterpaul
- RR Diner Member
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 1:06 am
Re: Part 5 - Case files (SPOILERS)
I'm not saying it was accidental on Lynch's part--of course, it was completely intentional. It's a meticulously constructed scene. And, yes, absolutely something is off. The observation that the women in pink seem to be in an empty room, and that their coverage doesn't jibe with any of the other shots in the scene is 100% accurate.secretlettermkr wrote:this is not "rationalize",,, its an observation of a very obvious thing, if the intention wasnt to imply something off w these girls,... Lynch could have shot it or edited diferentlycounterpaul wrote:It's beautifully unsettling, from the moment Candie opens the door of what appears to be an otherwise empty room. It's not a plot thing--I'll eat my hat if we end up finding out that the women in pink are spirits or some such--it's a mood thing. They act as counterpoint to the violence and posturing going on in the scene and add an air of the uncanny. Why try to rationalize it? Twin Peaks isn't rational. What a scrumptious thing those cut-aways are!
What I'm saying is that creating this feeling of things being off is the entire point of shooting and cutting the scene this way. It's about creating mood. It needs no plot justification. That's the rationalizing I was referring to--trying to come up with ways to take something beautifully uncanny and force it to make "sense." That, I maintain, is completely missing the point.