Parts 3 & 4 - Call for help & ...brings back some memories (SPOILERS)

Discussion of each of the 18 parts of Twin Peaks the Return

Moderators: Annie, BookhouseBoyBob, Ross, Jerry Horne, Brad D

User avatar
Jerry Horne
Posts: 4533
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:28 pm
Location: Private Portland Airport
Contact:

Re: Parts 3 + 4 (Spoilers)

Postby Jerry Horne » Tue May 23, 2017 12:44 pm

thedougpa wrote:Am I the only one that thought the image on the playing card was an ant's head?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


My first reaction was it's a reference to his 'Rabbits' project.
User avatar
mtwentz
Posts: 1881
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 10:02 am

Re: Parts 3 + 4 (Spoilers)

Postby mtwentz » Tue May 23, 2017 12:45 pm

Has anyone developed a theory as to what the Log says is missing form the Palmer evidence file? Are we all convinced it is missing diary pages stating the Good Dale is trapped in the Lodge? (which of course, he isn't anymore- at least we think he isn't).
"Dougie is COOPER? How the Hell is this!?"
Neosmith
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 7:56 pm

Re: Parts 3 + 4 (Spoilers)

Postby Neosmith » Tue May 23, 2017 12:45 pm

I think the symbol was an Owl, not an Ant.
User avatar
Here Comes That Bob
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 8:03 am

Re: Parts 3 + 4 (Spoilers)

Postby Here Comes That Bob » Tue May 23, 2017 12:46 pm

thedougpa wrote:Am I the only one that thought the image on the playing card was an ant's head?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


I thought it was a reference to "touched by the devilish one".
douglasb
Posts: 241
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 1:51 pm
Location: Exiled in England
Contact:

Re: Parts 3 + 4 (Spoilers)

Postby douglasb » Tue May 23, 2017 12:47 pm

BadCoop was in danger, but why did Dougie have assassins on his back too? His wife mentions being able to "pay off" someone.
Neosmith
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 7:56 pm

Re: Parts 3 + 4 (Spoilers)

Postby Neosmith » Tue May 23, 2017 12:48 pm

douglasb wrote:BadCoop was in danger, but why did Dougie have assassins on his back too? His wife mentions being able to "pay off" someone.


From what I've inferred, those guys work for Evil Cob. They were supposed to take out Cooper, if he had materialized, so Cob would be the only Cooper left.
User avatar
Henrys Hair
Posts: 156
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:28 am
Contact:

Re: Parts 3 + 4 (Spoilers)

Postby Henrys Hair » Tue May 23, 2017 12:50 pm

mtwentz wrote:
Here Comes That Bob wrote:Does anyone have any clue on the significance of Richard and Linda? Are they someone Cooper used to know or maybe people involved in his previous cases? I really don't know.


Right now, I would consider that question to be one of the central mysteries, if not THE central mystery, of the series.

I have not heard of any theories so far.


The first thing I thought of was 'Richard and Linda Thompson' although no idea how they might connect to anything in Twin Peaks.

This might already have been mentioned, but the number given by the tree is 2-5-0 in the subtitles but 2-5-7 spoken.

Could the junkie saying 1-1-9 be a cry for help? 119 being 911 backwards...
User avatar
Pöllö
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 11:28 am

Re: Parts 3 + 4 (Spoilers)

Postby Pöllö » Tue May 23, 2017 12:51 pm

Do anyone of you think that the show will become more grounded and have more scenes that are reminiscent of the old TP as it goes on, like some have suggested? Or do you think it will stay the same way stylistically.
The cow jumped over the moon.
User avatar
Jerry Horne
Posts: 4533
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:28 pm
Location: Private Portland Airport
Contact:

Re: Parts 3 + 4 (Spoilers)

Postby Jerry Horne » Tue May 23, 2017 12:51 pm

There's nothing wrong with disagreement and vigorous discussion. Let's do it with common courtesy.
Dom834
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2016 11:39 am

Re: Parts 3 + 4 (Spoilers)

Postby Dom834 » Tue May 23, 2017 12:52 pm

sneakydave wrote:Did folks spot the blue rose on the table in the non-existent place whilst Coop is talking to Not-Ronette?


Here it is
Attachments
ROSE.jpg
ROSE.jpg (64.54 KiB) Viewed 5527 times
User avatar
Here Comes That Bob
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 8:03 am

Re: Parts 3 + 4 (Spoilers)

Postby Here Comes That Bob » Tue May 23, 2017 12:55 pm

Jerry Horne wrote:There's nothing wrong with disagreement and vigorous discussion. Let's do it with common courtesy.


To whom is this referenced to ? Everyone are pretty civil and respectful in this thread.
User avatar
TweetPeak
Posts: 91
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 7:12 am

Re: Parts 3 + 4 (Spoilers)

Postby TweetPeak » Tue May 23, 2017 12:56 pm

yes i spotted the Blue Rose but i did forget about it. like about the Choco Bunnies.

The thing on the Card is the Owl Symbol! Of course!
User avatar
Mairzy
Posts: 77
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:50 am

Re: Parts 3 + 4 (Spoilers)

Postby Mairzy » Tue May 23, 2017 12:58 pm

Dom834 wrote:
sneakydave wrote:Did folks spot the blue rose on the table in the non-existent place whilst Coop is talking to Not-Ronette?


Here it is


No way. Well spotted. Minutes after Major Garland Briggs' words. Is this the origin of the Blue Rose itself, have these been discovered or sighted before in connection to the Lodge worlds?
User avatar
Here Comes That Bob
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 8:03 am

Re: Parts 3 + 4 (Spoilers)

Postby Here Comes That Bob » Tue May 23, 2017 12:59 pm

TweetPeak wrote:yes i spotted the Blue Rose but i did forget about it. like about the Choco Bunnies.

The thing on the Card is the Owl Symbol! Of course!


My goodness, you're right! IT's definitely an owl cave symbol. The only difference is that the rotated square is replaced with a black circle of an ace card. I think that's what make the most sense.
User avatar
mtwentz
Posts: 1881
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 10:02 am

Re: Parts 3 + 4 (Spoilers)

Postby mtwentz » Tue May 23, 2017 1:00 pm

Pöllö wrote:Do anyone of you think that the show will become more grounded and have more scenes that are reminiscent of the old TP as it goes on, like some have suggested? Or do you think it will stay the same way stylistically.


I think people are exaggerating how different Twin Peaks is in this show vs. the old show. Truth be told, we just have not seen much of Twin Peaks at all, except for Hawk, Andy and Lucy.

Once we finally see the RR and the atmosphere there (and the Great Northern aside from Ben's office) then we can get a better appraisal of the town overall.
"Dougie is COOPER? How the Hell is this!?"

Return to “Parts Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests