Parts 3 & 4 - Call for help & ...brings back some memories (SPOILERS)

Discussion of each of the 18 parts of Twin Peaks the Return

Moderators: Brad D, Annie, Jonah, BookhouseBoyBob, Ross, Jerry Horne

User avatar
Jerry Horne
Global Moderator
Posts: 4634
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:28 pm
Location: Private Portland Airport
Contact:

Re: Parts 3 + 4 (Spoilers)

Post by Jerry Horne »

thedougpa wrote:Am I the only one that thought the image on the playing card was an ant's head?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
My first reaction was it's a reference to his 'Rabbits' project.
RARE TWIN PEAKS COLLECTIBLES AT ---> WWW.TWINPEAKSGENERALSTORE.BLOGSPOT.COM
User avatar
mtwentz
Lodge Member
Posts: 2185
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 10:02 am

Re: Parts 3 + 4 (Spoilers)

Post by mtwentz »

Has anyone developed a theory as to what the Log says is missing form the Palmer evidence file? Are we all convinced it is missing diary pages stating the Good Dale is trapped in the Lodge? (which of course, he isn't anymore- at least we think he isn't).
F*&^ you Gene Kelly
Neosmith
Roadhouse Member
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 7:56 pm

Re: Parts 3 + 4 (Spoilers)

Post by Neosmith »

I think the symbol was an Owl, not an Ant.
User avatar
Here Comes That Bob
RR Diner Member
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 8:03 am

Re: Parts 3 + 4 (Spoilers)

Post by Here Comes That Bob »

thedougpa wrote:Am I the only one that thought the image on the playing card was an ant's head?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I thought it was a reference to "touched by the devilish one".
douglasb
RR Diner Member
Posts: 241
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 1:51 pm
Location: Exiled in England
Contact:

Re: Parts 3 + 4 (Spoilers)

Post by douglasb »

BadCoop was in danger, but why did Dougie have assassins on his back too? His wife mentions being able to "pay off" someone.
Neosmith
Roadhouse Member
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 7:56 pm

Re: Parts 3 + 4 (Spoilers)

Post by Neosmith »

douglasb wrote:BadCoop was in danger, but why did Dougie have assassins on his back too? His wife mentions being able to "pay off" someone.
From what I've inferred, those guys work for Evil Cob. They were supposed to take out Cooper, if he had materialized, so Cob would be the only Cooper left.
User avatar
Henrys Hair
RR Diner Member
Posts: 211
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:28 am
Contact:

Re: Parts 3 + 4 (Spoilers)

Post by Henrys Hair »

mtwentz wrote:
Here Comes That Bob wrote:Does anyone have any clue on the significance of Richard and Linda? Are they someone Cooper used to know or maybe people involved in his previous cases? I really don't know.
Right now, I would consider that question to be one of the central mysteries, if not THE central mystery, of the series.

I have not heard of any theories so far.
The first thing I thought of was 'Richard and Linda Thompson' although no idea how they might connect to anything in Twin Peaks.

This might already have been mentioned, but the number given by the tree is 2-5-0 in the subtitles but 2-5-7 spoken.

Could the junkie saying 1-1-9 be a cry for help? 119 being 911 backwards...
User avatar
Pöllö
RR Diner Member
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 11:28 am

Re: Parts 3 + 4 (Spoilers)

Post by Pöllö »

Do anyone of you think that the show will become more grounded and have more scenes that are reminiscent of the old TP as it goes on, like some have suggested? Or do you think it will stay the same way stylistically.
The cow jumped over the moon.
User avatar
Jerry Horne
Global Moderator
Posts: 4634
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:28 pm
Location: Private Portland Airport
Contact:

Re: Parts 3 + 4 (Spoilers)

Post by Jerry Horne »

There's nothing wrong with disagreement and vigorous discussion. Let's do it with common courtesy.
RARE TWIN PEAKS COLLECTIBLES AT ---> WWW.TWINPEAKSGENERALSTORE.BLOGSPOT.COM
Dom834
Roadhouse Member
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2016 11:39 am

Re: Parts 3 + 4 (Spoilers)

Post by Dom834 »

sneakydave wrote:Did folks spot the blue rose on the table in the non-existent place whilst Coop is talking to Not-Ronette?
Here it is
Attachments
ROSE.jpg
ROSE.jpg (64.54 KiB) Viewed 11499 times
User avatar
Here Comes That Bob
RR Diner Member
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 8:03 am

Re: Parts 3 + 4 (Spoilers)

Post by Here Comes That Bob »

Jerry Horne wrote:There's nothing wrong with disagreement and vigorous discussion. Let's do it with common courtesy.
To whom is this referenced to ? Everyone are pretty civil and respectful in this thread.
User avatar
TweetPeak
Roadhouse Member
Posts: 91
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 7:12 am

Re: Parts 3 + 4 (Spoilers)

Post by TweetPeak »

yes i spotted the Blue Rose but i did forget about it. like about the Choco Bunnies.

The thing on the Card is the Owl Symbol! Of course!
User avatar
Mairzy
Roadhouse Member
Posts: 77
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:50 am

Re: Parts 3 + 4 (Spoilers)

Post by Mairzy »

Dom834 wrote:
sneakydave wrote:Did folks spot the blue rose on the table in the non-existent place whilst Coop is talking to Not-Ronette?
Here it is
No way. Well spotted. Minutes after Major Garland Briggs' words. Is this the origin of the Blue Rose itself, have these been discovered or sighted before in connection to the Lodge worlds?
User avatar
Here Comes That Bob
RR Diner Member
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 8:03 am

Re: Parts 3 + 4 (Spoilers)

Post by Here Comes That Bob »

TweetPeak wrote:yes i spotted the Blue Rose but i did forget about it. like about the Choco Bunnies.

The thing on the Card is the Owl Symbol! Of course!
My goodness, you're right! IT's definitely an owl cave symbol. The only difference is that the rotated square is replaced with a black circle of an ace card. I think that's what make the most sense.
User avatar
mtwentz
Lodge Member
Posts: 2185
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 10:02 am

Re: Parts 3 + 4 (Spoilers)

Post by mtwentz »

Pöllö wrote:Do anyone of you think that the show will become more grounded and have more scenes that are reminiscent of the old TP as it goes on, like some have suggested? Or do you think it will stay the same way stylistically.
I think people are exaggerating how different Twin Peaks is in this show vs. the old show. Truth be told, we just have not seen much of Twin Peaks at all, except for Hawk, Andy and Lucy.

Once we finally see the RR and the atmosphere there (and the Great Northern aside from Ben's office) then we can get a better appraisal of the town overall.
F*&^ you Gene Kelly
Post Reply