Page 25 of 42

Re: Final Dossier Spoilers

Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2017 9:51 am
by Poiuyt
Tosker wrote:My initial reaction is that a lot more of this should have been covered in the show.
agreed 100%.

Re: Final Dossier Spoilers

Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2017 11:11 am
by ganzuccio
I've read it, it came fronm germany.

Splendid!!!!!!

Re: Final Dossier Spoilers

Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2017 5:35 pm
by chromereflectsimage
Nothing on Janey-E and Diane? For characters that got a lot of screen time in the return, you'd think we might get some backstory on them, but I guess not.

Re: Final Dossier Spoilers

Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2017 12:06 am
by Agent Earle
chromereflectsimage wrote:Nothing on Janey-E and Diane? For characters that got a lot of screen time in the return, you'd think we might get some backstory on them, but I guess not.
That's why I say this book feels like it was put together by a longtime TP fan who's been alienated by Season 3 and just wants to give proper due to the beloved original characters. Which is fine and dandy with me, I just wish I didn't have to receive my long-coveted return to Twin Peaks in a book form.

Re: RE: Re: Final Dossier Spoilers

Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2017 2:35 am
by Rik Renault
chromereflectsimage wrote:Nothing on Janey-E and Diane? For characters that got a lot of screen time in the return, you'd think we might get some backstory on them, but I guess not.
I think the book deals mostly with the gap between S2 and S3 though, so this is to be expected.

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

Re: Final Dossier Spoilers

Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2017 3:09 am
by Xavi
As far as I know everything in TFD is from Tammy's perspective. This can never reveal when/why/how Cooper visited the Giant/???????/Fireman, can never reveal any detailed information about our beloved Major Briggs - why/how/when Dougie's ring came in his stomach - , and can never explain ... etc, etc. In Diane's word "Fuck you, Tammy." In my own words "In Lynch I trust."

Re: Final Dossier Spoilers

Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2017 6:39 am
by Pinky
this Reddit post is pretty intriguing, can someone brighter than me poke holes in it to see if it holds up? Spoilers are openly discussed: https://www.reddit.com/r/twinpeaks/comm ... art_18_to/

Re: Final Dossier Spoilers

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 3:11 am
by Rik Renault
Pinky wrote:this Reddit post is pretty intriguing, can someone brighter than me poke holes in it to see if it holds up? Spoilers are openly discussed: https://www.reddit.com/r/twinpeaks/comm ... art_18_to/
I think I need to do a rewatch of TR with this new information to fully flesh out any ideas I have, but I do remember back in one of the part discussions I commented that The Red Room appeared to split – through visual effects – and MIKE states that something is wrong. I'm convinced now that this is the point where the two timelines diverge. I'll need a full rewatch to see if these two Coopers can be marked by their FBI pin, but my worry is that we're getting into Christopher Nolan territory with that. I think it also ties in nicely with Frost's comments at the Austin Film Festival about Jungian ideas of duality and Cooper not fully incorporating his shadow self.

I have to say I'm really enjoying the ideas I and other people seem to be having with the new information from Frost. A lot of the hardcore gang seemed to be of the idea that any closure or revealing of the mystery negates the more thematic elements of the show but, in my view, it has crystallised the themes and brought them into a sharper focus to be explored.

Re: Final Dossier Spoilers

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 3:31 am
by powerleftist
True Fans before the final dossier: "I'm OK with not having answers"

True Fans after the final dossier: "Oh, WOW, that is extremely interesting! Cool!"

Re: Final Dossier Spoilers

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 3:46 am
by Xavi
True cinema buffs do not need any book and they remain focused in finding convincing answers within the 18 hours lasting audio-visual limitation.

Re: Final Dossier Spoilers

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 4:54 am
by NormoftheAndes
Xavi wrote:True cinema buffs do not need any book and they remain focused in finding convincing answers within the 18 hours lasting audio-visual limitation.
The book is part of the canon - both the show itself and the book are all part of Twin Peaks. Mark Frost is a big part of it all, I don't understand what your problem is.

Re: Final Dossier Spoilers

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 6:55 am
by N. Needleman
Xavi wrote:True cinema buffs do not need any book and they remain focused in finding convincing answers within the 18 hours lasting audio-visual limitation.
Oh, come off it. Plenty of us are cinephiles. Twin Peaks has a lot of ancillary merchandising that contributes to the larger tapestry - the Secret Diary was integral to Sheryl Lee's performance and Laura's narrative in FWWM. We can walk and chew gum at the same time.

Re: Final Dossier Spoilers

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 7:15 am
by Trudy Chelgren
powerleftist wrote:

True Fans before the final dossier: "I'm OK with not having answers"

True Fans after the final dossier: "Oh, WOW, that is extremely interesting! Cool!"


I don't get your approach. There are people who can appreciate, or discern, the two works as being seperate things. It may be 'canon', whatever that even means at this point, but some people will see The Final Dossier as being as vital and important as The Return itself, and there are some who won't. That's fine, it's not all mutually exclusive. These are only one creator's ideas, you can take them as seriously as you choose. You can find how Frost sees the story, and where he takes it interesting, without feeling the need to have everything answered. "True Fan" pokes are tired.

Personally, I enjoyed The Return, the messy heap that it was. Finding my own answers has been fun. I'm not really invested in The Final Dossier, or Frost's answers. I don't really like how he's closed Annie's story, I think it's unsubtle and a bit sickly-poignant. I get the irony involved, but I understand why anyone would be curious about what Frost has to say, regardless of how little some really want to be told. If it's a story told well, then why not?
N. Needleman wrote:
We can walk and chew gum at the same time.
This.

Re: Final Dossier Spoilers

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 8:09 am
by Rik Renault
Can anybody recall in this series a character specifically mentioning the *death* of Laura Palmer? I want to save my rewatch until after I've finished TFD myself, but I'm wondering if there's anything in the idea that the Twin Peaks we mostly see in The Return is from the timeline where Laura just disappeared?

EDIT: Already found something:
Ben Horne: [holding a room key] Room 315. Wait a minute. I think that was the room where Agent Cooper was shot.
Beverly Paige: Who's Agent Cooper?
Ben Horne: FBI. He was here, I don't know, maybe 25 years ago investigating the murder of Laura Palmer.
Beverly Paige: Who's Laura Palmer?
Ben Horne: Oh, that, my dear, is a long story.

Re: Final Dossier Spoilers

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2017 8:46 am
by Xavi
Rik Renault wrote:Can anybody recall in this series a character specifically mentioning the *death* of Laura Palmer? I want to save my rewatch until after I've finished TFD myself, but I'm wondering if there's anything in the idea that the Twin Peaks we mostly see in The Return is from the timeline where Laura just disappeared?

EDIT: Already found something:
Ben Horne: [holding a room key] Room 315. Wait a minute. I think that was the room where Agent Cooper was shot.
Beverly Paige: Who's Agent Cooper?
Ben Horne: FBI. He was here, I don't know, maybe 25 years ago investigating the murder of Laura Palmer.
Beverly Paige: Who's Laura Palmer?
Ben Horne: Oh, that, my dear, is a long story.

TPS03E07
[Truman] Laura never met Cooper.
[Truman] He came here after she died, didn't he?