Bigger question will be whether Sky Atlantic runs it with commercials. I'm damned if I'll sit up all night dealing with six minutes of commercials every few minutes...Panapaok wrote:It's 2 hours.djerdap wrote:When we're talking about cable networks, does 2 hours really mean that or is it 90 minutes like in network TV?
NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread
Moderators: Brad D, Annie, Jonah, BookhouseBoyBob, Ross, Jerry Horne
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
-
- RR Diner Member
- Posts: 494
- Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 12:31 pm
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
I don't have access to Sky Atlantic, but it being a PPV channel, I don't expect them to break shows at all, or do they usually do that???
-
- RR Diner Member
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2015 3:15 am
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
Quick google suggests that they do, even for game of thrones, which a lot of people are unhappy about. Looks like we're stuck with ad breaks during the live broadcast and pointless idents breaking up the on-demand streams
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
Interesting interview with Laura Harring in which she discusses, essentially, turning down a role in the new season: http://www.dazeddigital.com/artsandcult ... -interview
-
- RR Diner Member
- Posts: 494
- Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 12:31 pm
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
Screw that agent!
No seriously, don't artist's have their own creative control after all...?
Also interesting how it's being stated as "200 cameos"...
No seriously, don't artist's have their own creative control after all...?
Also interesting how it's being stated as "200 cameos"...
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
Everything increasingly points to a lot of these more well known actors having very small roles, the exceptions probably being Watts, Belushi and Knepper.dronerstone wrote:Screw that agent!
No seriously, don't artist's have their own creative control after all...?
Also interesting how it's being stated as "200 cameos"...
F*&^ you Gene Kelly
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
Dern also seems to have a substantial role due to her long working relationship with Lynch. I doubt she would be present at the TCA event if it was a very small part.
Also, Club Silencio looks like the Red Room?
Also, Club Silencio looks like the Red Room?
https://thirtythreexthree.wordpress.com/ - 33x3: 33 favourite films by 33 directors, 33 favourite books by 33 authors, 33 favourite albums by 33 musicians and 3 favourite TV series
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
Just chiming in because I want to post something. Nothing to see here. Just watching and waiting. What a wait this has been. Speculation abounds. We know nothing, really. Even those of us who are local saw stuff that can't be readily explained. Nothing has come easy. In a few weeks, we'll all know.... something more. What that is, nobody knows. Even then, we may not know.
I like that. A lot.
I like that. A lot.
We live inside a dream.
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
But the question is...how did her agent know it was one of 200 cameos? It doesn't seem likely that information was given. And even if Lynch didn't quite have a role in mind for her and was just reaching out and saying "are you interested in a small role?" that still doesn't explain how an agent, or Laura Harring for that matter, would know there it would be one small role amongst that many others. It seems to me her agent wanted her to hold out for a bigger role, and only now is Harring/her agent assuming that there are 200 cameos. Any thoughts on that, anyone?dronerstone wrote:Screw that agent!
No seriously, don't artist's have their own creative control after all...?
Also interesting how it's being stated as "200 cameos"...
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
I would think even Lynch would be upfront with whether they were looking at her for something that would require blocking six months of her time, or two days.LateReg wrote:But the question is...how did her agent know it was one of 200 cameos? It doesn't seem likely that information was given. And even if Lynch didn't quite have a role in mind for her and was just reaching out and saying "are you interested in a small role?" that still doesn't explain how an agent, or Laura Harring for that matter, would know there it would be one small role amongst that many others. It seems to me her agent wanted her to hold out for a bigger role, and only now is Harring/her agent assuming that there are 200 cameos. Any thoughts on that, anyone?dronerstone wrote:Screw that agent!
No seriously, don't artist's have their own creative control after all...?
Also interesting how it's being stated as "200 cameos"...
Anyway, I won't miss Laura Harring. Now Justin Theroux on the other hand, I'm still super bummed he's not showing up.
- Agent Sam Stanley
- Bookhouse Member
- Posts: 1019
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 2:04 pm
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
They do. In the end it was her decision to make, but the agent probably advised her to ask for something more substancial, especially given her past working relationship with Lynch.dronerstone wrote:Screw that agent!
No seriously, don't artist's have their own creative control after all...?
Last edited by Agent Sam Stanley on Tue Apr 11, 2017 12:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Agent Sam Stanley
- Bookhouse Member
- Posts: 1019
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 2:04 pm
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
Ugh, tell me about it. He was probably shooting The Leftovers at the time.Rudagger wrote: Anyway, I won't miss Laura Harring. Now Justin Theroux on the other hand, I'm still super bummed he's not showing up.
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
What does this mean?"The original Twin Peaks ending, with the old man, was hysterical.”
"I can see half my life's history in your face... And I'm not sure that I want to."
http://twinpeakssoundtrackdesign.blogspot.com/
http://twinpeakssoundtrackdesign.blogspot.com/
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
Probably thinking of the bank vault scene.Ross wrote:What does this mean?"The original Twin Peaks ending, with the old man, was hysterical.”
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
Or the beginning of season 2...Rudagger wrote:Probably thinking of the bank vault scene.Ross wrote:What does this mean?"The original Twin Peaks ending, with the old man, was hysterical.”