So they have because they knew they had opened themselves up to be sued for breaking the nda. The writer is a complete plank.Skip Bittman wrote:They just removed some of the casting spoilage and removed the comments yelling at them for said spoilage.
NON SPOILERS: Twin Peaks: Season 3 on Showtime Thread
Moderators: Brad D, Annie, Jonah, BookhouseBoyBob, Ross, Jerry Horne
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
When Jupiter and Saturn meet...
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
Loved the quote from the mashable article. That's exactly what I want to hear.
This is - excuse me - a damn fine cup of coffee.
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
Panapaok wrote:Loved the quote from the mashable article. That's exactly what I want to hear.
me too
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
Me three.kafa81 wrote:Panapaok wrote:Loved the quote from the mashable article. That's exactly what I want to hear.
me too
When Jupiter and Saturn meet...
- Mr. Reindeer
- Lodge Member
- Posts: 3680
- Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2015 4:09 pm
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
Not going to read that article, but going off of people's reactions, it's pretty irresponsible of the writer to risk his personal finances as well as his future professional credibility and likelihood of being invited to such events, in the name of one piece of clickbait.
- Harry S. Truman
- RR Diner Member
- Posts: 321
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 2:48 pm
- Location: Spain
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
kafa81 wrote:anyone think TSHOTP is now making more sense to some fans?
It would make sense if this season had been problems with time as alternative timelines. Would have explained the inconsistencies of the book of frost, but according to this article "it seems that there are no problems with time".
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
Was this posted?
"From the Dutch newspaper NRC: 'feels' like the old show, still a mix of humor and horror. Can't say more because of embargo."
"From the Dutch newspaper NRC: 'feels' like the old show, still a mix of humor and horror. Can't say more because of embargo."
I have no idea where this will lead us, but I have a definite feeling it will be a place both wonderful and strange.
- Twink Peaks
- RR Diner Member
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2017 2:01 pm
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
kafa81 wrote:Jonah wrote:Hope it didn't ruin anything for you
he deleted first 3 points
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
Did anyone manage to save the details of the article that were deleted?
This is - excuse me - a damn fine cup of coffee.
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
Must have missed them then, as the "first point" I referred to is still on there. The other ones must have been much more spoilery then.Twink Peaks wrote:kafa81 wrote:Jonah wrote:Hope it didn't ruin anything for you
he deleted first 3 points
I have no idea where this will lead us, but I have a definite feeling it will be a place both wonderful and strange.
-
- New Member
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2017 2:36 pm
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
Like some others I'll be logging off now until I've watched the first four hours, knowing that something mildly unexpected apparently happens has already made me feel a tinsy bit spoiled Let's hope nothing like that crosses my Twitter timeline before Monday morning!
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
Yeah, I feel we probably shouldn't discuss anymore on here either along these lines, until we get a heads up from a mod about what's allowed.
I mean, can we speculate/guess based on what is in that yahoo article - behind spoiler tags? Or are we not to discuss it further at all?
Looking forward to getting some clarification on that.
In the meantime, for everyone's sake, probably best we don't discuss this much further.
I mean, can we speculate/guess based on what is in that yahoo article - behind spoiler tags? Or are we not to discuss it further at all?
Looking forward to getting some clarification on that.
In the meantime, for everyone's sake, probably best we don't discuss this much further.
I have no idea where this will lead us, but I have a definite feeling it will be a place both wonderful and strange.
-
- RR Diner Member
- Posts: 478
- Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 4:52 am
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
I don't know how I'm going to be able to stand these next 24 hours.
-
- RR Diner Member
- Posts: 478
- Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 4:52 am
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
What prep are you guys doing tomorrow then? I'm going to watch FWWM just before and time it just up to the broadcast, and probably do Blue Velvet before.
Re: NO SPOILERS: Twin Peaks Season 3 on Showtime May 21st 2017
I haven't rewatched the show since 2015, which is strange as I used to rewatch it almost every year. I was going to rewatch some before the premiere, but now I think it might be better to go in "fresh", operating off memory, and rewatch later on.
I have no idea where this will lead us, but I have a definite feeling it will be a place both wonderful and strange.