Despite being a big Lynch fan, I actually haven't watched this one yet. I DID recently pick up a copy, however.
Should I watch it in one sitting, or perhaps break it up into parts? I normally hate doing the latter but I've heard this can be quite a struggle of a film!
Search found 4 matches
- Wed Dec 10, 2014 2:17 am
- Forum: INLAND EMPIRE (2006)
- Topic: fascinating boredom
- Replies: 25
- Views: 47795
- Mon Dec 08, 2014 5:19 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Would Showtime Edit Original Series for Twin Peaks 2016
- Replies: 86
- Views: 63545
Re: Would Showtime Edit Original Series for Twin Peaks 2016
That would be a lot more interesting to me. As long as it was sanctioned by Lynch and Frost then I'd be behind it all the way.lindseylee wrote:Here's a twist. What if Lynch wanted to do an edit extending the Series with deleted material?
I doubt they'd go for it though, Lynch especially.
- Mon Dec 08, 2014 5:18 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: unanswered questions / mistakes / etc.
- Replies: 98
- Views: 98040
Re: unanswered questions / mistakes / etc.
I just rewatched this episode last night and never noticed just how clear it is that the fake blood is already there! Gave me a chuckle.Si78 wrote:One that bugs me is how Harold clearly accidentally gets fake blood on his face before he applies pressure to cut himself in episode 12.
- Mon Dec 08, 2014 2:18 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Would Showtime Edit Original Series for Twin Peaks 2016
- Replies: 86
- Views: 63545
Re: Would Showtime Edit Original Series for Twin Peaks 2016
I definitely wouldn't want them to edit out anything whatsoever. I've personally never understood people who think that any of the storylines are so poor that they detract from the show as a whole. Sure, I like some plot points a lot more than others but I don't think a single one qualifies as 'bad'...